Ia tangata · every person

The Law Commission spent almost three years on this. The Government shelved it in a day.

There is already a careful, independent answer to how our law should protect trans, non-binary and intersex New Zealanders. It is called Ia Tangata. It is finished. It just needs picking back up.

Add your name, and ask the next Parliament to.

Should all people in Aotearoa get the same protection from discrimination?

Be one of the first thousand to sign.

We never share your details. Minimal information, stored in New Zealand's region, and deleted the moment you ask. How we handle your data.

The fix

What Ia Tangata is, and why it carries weight

This is not a quick opinion. In 2022 the Minister of Justice asked the Law Commission, the independent body that reviews whether our laws still work, to look at how the Human Rights Act protects trans, non-binary and intersex people. The Commission published an issues paper, ran a 10-week public consultation, and took more than 700 submissions. It held hui with community groups and convened a wānanga of Māori experts. In 2025 it handed back a 450-page report with 27 recommendations. Its name is Ia Tangata.

The heart of it is simple. The Human Rights Act already protects you from discrimination for your sex, race, religion, disability and more. It does not yet name being trans, non-binary, or intersex. Ia Tangata's central recommendation is to add us, so the law says plainly what most New Zealanders already assume.

Most of it is modest. Since a 2006 Crown Law opinion, "sex" in the Act has been read to cover gender identity, and employers, schools and services have quietly got on with it for twenty years. Ia Tangata writes that down and clears up the uncertainty. The Definitions Bill now in Parliament would tear it up instead. One is tidying the house. The other is taking a hammer to it.

Read the full report at lawcom.govt.nz →

In plain terms

What this actually means for a trans person

If you are trans, non-binary or intersex, here is what changes if Ia Tangata is put into law:

  • You could not be turned down for a job, a flat, or a service just for being trans. It would be named discrimination, the same as it already is for your race or a disability.
  • The "prove your birth sex at the door" idea for bathrooms and changing rooms is shut down. As the Commission points out, no New Zealand ID even records your sex at birth, so it could never actually work.
  • A school could not refuse a student whose gender matches the school.
  • Sport gets a clear, case-by-case fairness-and-safety test, decided sport by sport, instead of a blanket ban.
  • Intersex people are protected from discrimination by name, for the first time.

And here is what it does not do, in the Commission's own words: it would not criminalise misgendering or deadnaming, and it makes no rules about anyone's speech. It also does not force anything on anyone. It just closes a gap.

Ia tangata · every person

Why this is good for everyone

Follow the evidence

The homework is done. Almost three years, hundreds of submissions, and 27 careful recommendations from independent experts. When the country's own law reform body answers a question this thoroughly, the sensible thing is to use the answer, not bin it.

Protection, not politics

This is a repair, not a revolution. It makes explicit a protection that has quietly worked for twenty years. Calm, clarifying, and already how most of the country lives.

Every one of us

A law that reduces womanhood to a biology test is a problem for every woman. A law that protects identity protects all of us. Diverse gender has always been here; the binary written into statute is the import, not the people.

Questions people ask

Why did the Law Commission look at this at all?
The Commission does not choose its own topics. In November 2022 the Minister of Justice asked it to review how the Human Rights Act protects trans, non-binary and intersex people. It then did that work independently of the government.
What is the Human Rights Act?
It is the law that sets out when it is unlawful to discriminate against someone, that is, to treat them worse for a reason the law says is off limits. Section 21 lists those reasons: sex, marital status, religious and ethical belief, colour, race, ethnic or national origins, disability, age, political opinion, employment status, family status, and sexual orientation. Ia Tangata recommends adding gender identity and innate variations of sex characteristics to that list.
Who does it cover?
People who are transgender (whose gender is different from the sex they were assigned at birth), non-binary (whose gender is not simply male or female), and people with an innate variation of sex characteristics (born with a body that differs from typical ideas of male or female; some people call this being intersex).
How thorough was the consultation?
An issues paper in June 2024, a 10-week public consultation, more than 700 submissions from people and organisations, hui held with community groups, feedback gathered by the Free Speech Union and passed on, confidential interviews with intersex New Zealanders, and a wānanga of Māori experts. Then a 450-page final report in 2025.
Isn't this about free speech?
No. The Human Rights Act is about discrimination in jobs, housing and services, not about opinions. The Commission's review was anti-discrimination law, and it made no rules about speech. Nobody's speech changes. Someone's job security does.
What about single-sex spaces and sport?
The Commission worked through the exceptions in whole chapters and kept them where they are justified. Its recommendations are specific and public. Worth reading before repeating a headline about them.
What happens next?
The Commission's job is done. The government decides whether to act on the 27 recommendations. In February 2026 it said progressing them was not a priority. This campaign asks the next Parliament to pick the report back up.

See for yourself

Don't take our word for any of it. It all traces to the public record.

📄Law Commission, Ia Tangata (Report 150), September 2025 — the review and its 27 recommendations.
🗄️The Government's response, February 2026 — declining to progress the recommendations.
⚖️The Attorney-General's report — flagging an age-discrimination defect in the Definitions Bill.
📝The New Zealand Law Society — submitting that the Definitions Bill should not proceed past select committee.
🧭The Human Rights Commission — calling the Definitions Bill unnecessary and harmful.

The work is done. It just needs picking back up.

Every name is one more New Zealander on record for the evidence-based path. That is a number that matters when it lands on a decision-maker's desk.

Add my name